What To Do

Categories

Social Bookmarks

Feeds

    • CommentAuthorFree Memberjacanz
    • CommentTimeJan 11th 2008
     
    jacanz

    At the moment I run with a Nike Triax 250 (about 10 years old) and a Polar Beat heart rate monitor, one strapped round each wrist.The display on the Nike is starting to fail and there are no parts anywhere for it due to age.

    I am trying to decide whether to buy the current equivilent watch - the Nike Triax Speed 100 Super or move to an all in one device, looking at the Polar RS200 which will talk to the chest strap I currently own.

    I use the interval timer on the Nike or the chrono feature to track run duration withthe heart rate monitor giving a constant display of current heart rate. I do not need/want heart rate targets or alarms just simply the ability to display my current heart rate for me to manually monitor to confirm effort level.

    Does anyone have suggestions of which way to go or any experience with the Polar RS200 unit.

    Many thanks

  1.  
    maryclaire

    Hi,

     

    I have just upgraded from the RS200sd to the RS800G3.  The RS200 is a great unit, however  I found the footpod not always very accurate, no matter how I calibrated it.  Hence I would check it against mapmyrun.com  Personally, I get sucked in by the technology when really, a simple watch will do the same job.  A fool and his (her) money are easily parted I guess.  but I do like to analyse how far I've come in both physical distance and in my overall running abilities.  I really like to see my heart rate and how it reacts to different types of workouts.

     Hope that helps.

    Grace

    • CommentAuthorFree Memberrvtango
    • CommentTimeFeb 10th 2008
     
    rvtango

    Hi. I'm looking to buy my first HM so after looking through bunch of them I leaning towards Polar RS200. But I'm still little confused because none of the HMs sold on Amazon had consistently good reviews. But I guess even great products cannot satisfy every customer :( so all I can do is try it myself.

    RS200 unit had overall pretty decent reviews so I think I'll get one. 

  2.  
    jonbartolotta

    I have used Polar HR monitors for several years.  The first one I got as a gift and was the bare minimum.  It had a watch, stop watch, and HR.  I think I left that one behind on the gym bench one day (or my daughter started playing with it) and I never saw it again.  That was almost 3 years ago.  I then purchased the Polar S150 so I could use it with my bike also.  This was an excellent purchase.  I used it for over 2 years.  I came home from a run this past fall and let my son (1 year old) play with it for a few minutes while I entered my run into this website.  I have not seen it since.  Now I have 2 chest straps and a bike mount with no computer to go with it. 

    I would recommend this one ($139 retail) if you want to use it with a bike or the S120 ($119 retail) if you just want it for running.  I got mine on sale for $80.  I am going to purchase a replacement from ebay for about $80.

    Question...does anyone have any experience with any HR monitors other than Polar?  specifically Garmin or Cateye?  They all seem to have a lot of neat gadgets but as maryclaire said above "A fool and his (her) money are easily parted". 

  3.  
    woodsrunner
    one thing you can look at my friend got the garmin 305 I believe from walmart.com for 179 its supposed to be 349 and it has basically everything you could want. So maybe check out what walmart.com has you have to put it in your shopping cart to see how much it will be though
    • CommentAuthorFree MemberSimmoT
    • CommentTimeFeb 19th 2008
     
    SimmoT
    I have one a bit of research. I think polar RS200 is the best. It gets good reviews, and has the most for money.
    • CommentAuthorFree Memberappstr
    • CommentTimeFeb 20th 2008
     
    appstr
    I have had my Garmin 305 for about a year and it is great. Have had no problems and bought it online. Download every so often and have it set up for different internal training sessions. Only challange is not to look at your pace even when you just want an easy run...
    • CommentAuthorFree Memberlofikeja
    • CommentTimeFeb 21st 2008
     
    lofikeja

     

    I have the rs200sd and have not had any issues with it.  i have found that the foot pod is not as accurate as i would like.  i think it has to do with the fact that as i get in better shape my running stride changes.  over all it is a fine HR monitor.  i picked mine up on ebay for $180.  well worth it, i feel i train smarter with it.   

    • CommentAuthorFree Memberaaronades
    • CommentTimeFeb 21st 2008
     
    aaronades

    I've owned a basic Polar HRM for years and loved it.  I bought two of the "fitness" oriented monitors (Polar F11) for my my wife and retired father and it has been the foundation two amazing fitness transformations. Those a re fantastic units that keeps them both motivated and constantly improving their fitness.  As for myself, I just bought the full monty Polar RS800G3 with an S3 sensor on the side on eBay.  (FYI Prices on eBay are at least $100 cheaper for all  Polar models compared to anywhere else on the net and the sellers all have great feedback).

    I debated getting Garmin's new Forerunner 405 (the much more stylish update to the 305), but couldn't hold out for the impending official release.  Plus my previous experience with Polar and all of the running specific features sold me on the RS800.  Combined with Joel Friel's Total Heart Rate Training book, I am confident I will be completing my first Half Marathon this spring followed by a Full Marathon in the fall.

    • CommentAuthorFree MemberPokee
    • CommentTimeJun 12th 2008
     
    Pokee

    I bought this great sports bra by NuMetrex, which has the sensors knit into the fabric.  The best part is you don't need to wear the uncomfortable hard strap anymore.  It works with my Polar Wearlink, which snaps into the front of the bra and sends the signal to my watch.  They also make men's shirts.  Love it and will buy more...  numetrex.com

     

  4.  
    InnestrainsabitlikeRocky

    Here in the UK, Aldi sell their own brand (Cranesports) HRMs.  They cost £10.00.

     

    I got one the other day.  It seems fine!  I think I'll use that until I can afford a 405.

    • CommentAuthorFree Memberjpport123
    • CommentTimeJun 13th 2008
     
    jpport123

    I've run with Polar's for the last 15+ years with excellent results.  I did try a Nike version at one point, but was very dissapointed with the telemetry and acuracy.  Currently I'm running with a RS100, knowing that if this one croaks, there's a RS200 (probably an SD version) in my future.  Only problem is that it's not dying!!!!  I'm looking at over 3 years on the same battery... I guess there could be worse problems. 

    Hope that helps...

     

    • CommentAuthorFree Memberjp1
    • CommentTimeJun 13th 2008
     
    jp1
    The 625x has kept me happy with my data geekiness. It paces me tells me more then enough info and has a footpod. I swim and ride with it as well. Polar has a very helpful website so if you need more info it's in there. The price is a bit high.
    • CommentAuthorFree MemberGilly32
    • CommentTimeJun 18th 2008
     
    Gilly32
    I have always used the Polars.  Currently I use the RS800G3 and absolutely love it.
    • CommentAuthorFree MemberBeefcake
    • CommentTimeJun 18th 2008
     
    Beefcake

    What about Sports Instruments Pro 9? REI has one on clearance and I was thinking about picking it up.

     

     

    • CommentAuthorFree Membermobyrun
    • CommentTimeJun 20th 2008
     
    mobyrun

    hey everyone...this is my first post!  anyway...i just bought the garmin 405 a few days ago and i'm completely falling in love with it.  it has accuracy narrowed down to about 12ft and once the initial setup with your computer is done, it downloads automatically.  i don't have the foot pod, so not sure how that works, and since this is my first work after running for over a decade with a HR monitor, i'm not sure how accurate it is.  but it's comfortable and is easily read by the 405.  in any case, you just need to set your goals before you go run, otherwise you'll be overwhelmed with all the knowledge you get from it.

    tip:  make sure you let the GPS function COMPLETELY locate and position itself with the satellites.  this can take up to 10 or 15 fifteen minutes the first time, but after that the longest has been about 30 seconds for me.  obviously, start it up when you are outside and it will find the satellites faster.

    it is expensive, but with all the functionality, i forsee it being a steady partner for a while.  and I keep it away from my 3yr old.  that always helps ;)

    • CommentAuthorFree Membertthatche
    • CommentTimeJun 20th 2008
     
    tthatche
    I have the Garmin 305 that I got off of Ebay for $150 dollars.  Its refurbished but works great.  Its a little bit bigger than the 405 but with all of the features that you would ever want in a running watch. 
    • CommentAuthorFree Memberjverdeyen
    • CommentTimeJun 21st 2008
     
    jverdeyen

    I'm using Suunto T3C including footpod now for about a week (5 runs). Seems to match mapmyrun @ 95% correctness.

    I've been using Polar (don't know which model) for a while, ... couldn't satisfy my need. The Suunto is just fine!

    • CommentAuthorFree Membergeoenginer
    • CommentTimeJun 21st 2008
     
    geoenginer

    I've been using a very basic Polar (A3?) for several years.  Finding MapMyRun was a blessing and also got rid of my temptation to buy a new GPS / HRM device.  The Polar (which probably cost me $75 or so when I bought it) seems to do the trick just fine for my level of running, which I would describe as light (2-3 times per week, 2-4 miles). 

    Sometimes I get bad readings and I think it has to do with using synthetic shirts over the chest strap.  I do use electrically conductive jelly (medical supply used for EKG's) when I prep my strap and that seems to ensure a good reading fromt he begiinning.  But Underarmor shirts (and simiar materials) appear to be the culprit that sends my reading from 0% to 98% and back in seconds.  Does anyone know if there is a fix to this problem?

    • CommentAuthorFree MemberNaka2nv
    • CommentTimeJul 9th 2008
     
    Naka2nv
    Im new to this website and am attempting to get back into running after a year off (combination of laziness and recent leg/vein surgery). Runners world said i should walk a certain mileage and run/walk a certain amt of minutes to get back into the game, with that being said, I'd like to start doing better with keeping up with my Distance, Calories Burned & Pace. I have no earthly idea what to buy. Can anyone send suggestions on a good watch to buy for FIRST TIMERS non-gadget friendly person? I was looking at getting the Nike+ Sport Band but it got a lot of bad review on the sites that i was looking through so im skeptical (it only appealed to be because it looked EASY to read/work). I found a gadget that will allow me to wear it with non-Nike shoes but again i dont want to invest 59.99 (no matter how easy it is to work) if its gonna give inaccurate readings. Any suggestions are appreciated~!
  5.  
    IronWillDRunz

    Naka2nv-

    I would suggest you visit Amazon.com (or a similar website) and search for "Heart Rate Monitors".  You'll find watches from Polar, Garmin, Timex, and maybe one or two other manufacturers.  If you are only interested in distance, calories, and pace and do not need to see that info during your run, MapMyRun.com will give you all this information when you update your log with a pre-defined run. If you want to see distance, calories, and pace while you run, of course you will need a decent HRM. 

    For over a year, I used a very basic Polar that only showed my HR while I walked on my treadmill.  Now that I started running a few months ago, I purchased the Polar RS200sd.  And, outside of the fact that takes time to calibrate the footpod, I have found the RS200sd to be quite adequate and accurate for the running I do (about 15-20 miles per week). 

    I will be more than pleased to answer specific questions about the Polar RS200 or RS200sd. 

    Hope this helps!

    • CommentAuthorFree MemberMassageGuy
    • CommentTimeAug 13th 2008
     
    MassageGuy

    Take a look at the SUUNTO T3. I am about 400kms in to ownership of one, and I love it.

    Took about 2 10k runs to calibrate it, so now it's as near as dammit for distances both on MapMyRun and official distances at events.

    The foot pod isn't huge and over all it's very robust.

    Has all the info you could possibly need - you do have to purchase the PC pod to do the auto upload, but with the excellent software here, I haven't bothered with it.

    Most shops offer a "Marathon pack" that includes a foot pod.

    You can also easily match it to cycling, or a GPS pod or whatever.

    I also wear it day to day as a watch - it looks pretty nice.

    Having said that I will probably go for a Garmin 405 if ever any of the components croak - simply so I can utilise more of the stuff on this site.

    So far though I can't see that happening in the near future - I am notoriously meat fisted with training tools/technology and this thing doesn't seem to want to die!

    Hope that helps.

    • CommentAuthorFree MemberGilly32
    • CommentTimeAug 14th 2008
     
    Gilly32
    Polar RS800 Rocks!!!